Words to Names

Month, Day: Words, Names (Grace)

Words transitions to Names through Perfection. This has always interested me. Why?

Well, Names coalesce out of Words. In the SAQ #47 (This is a false supposition, for the origin of this composition is from God; it is God Who makes the combination, and as it is done according to the natural system, from each composition one being is produced, and an existence is realized. A composition made by man produces nothing because man cannot create.), we see counsel on how we ought to do science. Too, Names imply an object that can have separate existence with interesting attributes including behavior.

Yes. Right now, we look at Creation, learn things, then have the gall to think that the mathematics and other insights that we've obtained are sufficient enough to then try to overlay Creation with our understanding. It's backwards (quasi-empiricism). One side-effect?

The infinite divisioning by materialism plus the idiocy of some pure mathematics plus mis-matches between reality and truth as we think that we know it plus the emphasis on the elite as being those who know (hah, any and all can know God (Iqan, 233), the real motivation for science and knowledge).

Our abstractions ought to found themselves on Creation. This may imply more use of analog techniques and biological computational frameworks. Do I know what these are? Somewhat. But, that really is going to unfold when audacity, as far as it is necessary, takes hold.

Brights would pay attention if they were truly scientifically motivated, as opposed to being in the game of scientism and egotism.

Remarks:

08/05/2009 -- We'll look at SAQ #37 more in the context of how the Teleological influences.

Modified: 01/17/2010