Constructive efforts

Month, Day: 168, Beauty, Splendour (Majesty)

Being inspired by the brights (one in particular) can be good, if it motivates constructive (ala the proof type) methods that can be tested. Yet, is that not how science already works (or is supposed to work)?

Yes, but as the particular one (to be identified, in time) likes to point out, any who are under the delusion of God are hallucinating. Of course, that response is a broad brush-off of what is a real set of experiences. This is to be discussed further.

As well, the particular one is a figment of my imagination, just as what he perceives are to him similar figments. Notice, this is not the same as saying that he does not exist outside of my perception of him.

Rather, the whole framework needs some (not, necessarily as major as one might think) adjustment in order to allow into scrutiny a whole slew of phenomena that are now waved off (somewhat defensively by the brights, definitely accompanied by much more protestation than is reasonably (ah! one topic, from whence this?) necessary).

So, this little ground post indicates a small start. However, the theme will have priority henceforth and until otherwise noted.

Remarks:

07/25/2011 -- The choice: 'Tis or 'Tisn't.

06/02/2011 -- Construction II.

05/17/2011 -- Stephen gets press.

05/14/2011 -- A slow start.

05/09/2011 -- We need a re-look at Pascal's thoughts.

05/02/2011 -- One of the brights.

Modified: 07/25/2011