George's lessons

Month, Day: 168, Sovereignty, Words (Justice)

As we mentioned some from the past, namely Blaise and Immanuel, last time, we can also add George (the first) as he was in the real arenas of action (yes, not ivory-towered -- sorry, intellectuals -- George was a farmer, military officer, political office holder, and more); too, he was held in the highest esteem by his peers; yet, he rejected the thought that he could be crowned (ah, has not a journalist (Margaret Kimberley) depicted the current holder of George's office with a crown?). We cannot give enough credit to George for stepping down (how many want to grasp the ring of kinghood? -- peoples, it's a sign of immaturity).

---

As well, George was an autodidact. He may have been born into the order (or, as much of one [as possible] for those who ventured across the pond leaving behind what they knew [very old, yet unstable, order] for a bunch of unknowns [some of which would be the negative effect on the native population]), yet situations kept him from becoming part of the order (probably, fortunate for us). His schooling was limited since he was not able to get back to England at the time. He was tutored over [here] in Virginia (long way from Harvard, by the way -- but, that would have ruined him for us -- can explain). His family associations gave him the opportunity to explore and measure the new country. His physique, and health, was sufficient to help him evolve into leadership.

Through all that, he never succumbed to the classist nature of the aristocracy. In fact, his military subordinates were quite taken with the guy. By the way, his day of remembrance is coming up soon. Too, he was 100 years, like Immanuel, prior to the Manifestation (we'll get back to that).

There is a whole lot more to say, but let's leave it for later.

---

Recognizing the importance of George is not wrong. Staying apolitical (which goes with the Faith) does not imply being ignorant of what's going on or what has happened. One still has responsibility to vote; as well, being a good citizen is essential.

By the way, George had royal blood by several ancestors; from where we sit, he was much better than any of the George Ns (where N runs from "I" upward - of particular interest here, England). 

---

So, with George as inspiration, we're going to venture some thoughts. That is, we're going to go into an audacious mode and discuss a few topics over the next few months from a learned position (lifetime of study). These topics are the following (in no manner is to be considered a closed list): there is energy which we need to account for that is related to mind (how to do this?) which is a human trait; psych-ether is how I've characterized some of the dynamics, after dreams of discussions with Albert (yes, ether, as the Master said -- connotations, people -- its measurement will have to different than that which has been conceptualized and attempted -- failed to be observed, as we all know); the importance of dreams (Valley of Wonderment) as a filtered acquisition method (ah, how to overcome the inherent personal nature of this thing?); perhaps, biological receptors, and computers (you see, we've already seen how to use Light, though we have a lot more to learn) that are living things; again, Being is never expressed properly with mathematics (rather, it squishes out the living essence - or pushes it outside of the realm of the discourse -- yet, Being is beyond Words, to boot -- numeracy can be a bane -- plague -- on us); what might be termed reflection about the Revelation (where we can look back at George and the other greats -- they're still of the above-mentioned energy); Stephen says there is no need for God in his (their) model (propose where that model's deficiency leads to the negative prognostications of late -- abandon God's footstool?); ... ; last, but not least, how symmetry will help balance the views of Science and Religion.

Remarks:

08/01/2012 --Ether, in a manner that is unavoidably true. Our task? Show how to handle the matter from a scientific (the wise interpretation, okay?) framework. And, audacity is not necessary.

04/14/2012 -- Thornton Chase is an example of several things that will be discussed this year.

01/26/2012 -- Rather than start another post right now, more on the AE message: similar to how we dream up some operator (i -- thanks, Leonhard - 100 years) which is effective (complex numbers) and very much related to the method in manifold theory (computationally, differential geometry, by the way, explains the source, and some perturbations, of cognitive imbalances) that allows us to operate with linear extensions, we can bound a human (and, it's not exactly Hilbertian! -- thanks, David) with an existential framework that spans all worlds (look at the Writings - actually, it applies, too, with the small, atomic entities, of which we'll an aggregation -- call it, Plato-motivated, but that would be not be entirely right) and that will be much beneficial to resolving all sorts of problems (showing the power of symmetry not brought forth as of yet -- to my knowledge). And, it'll be partly mathematical. ... Incidentally, filters were mentioned. In part, a trained mind/intuition will be required (ultimate choice from the U.H.J. - to be described).

01/25/2012 -- As with all of the entrants into the American continent who were of European birth, there will be interactions with the Native population that might need to be studied within the context suggested by audacity (how? unknown). George did have a nickname that he got from his grandfather's actions.


Modified: 08/01/2012